Skip to main content

For Editors

Editorial skills in demand, 2026

Based on what employers actually have us test for — across 21,000+ completed assessments. Ranked by frequency, with the skills growing fastest year-over-year flagged.

Rank 1 · In 78% of assessment briefs

Mechanical accuracy

Punctuation, subject-verb agreement, modifier placement, parallelism. The table-stakes. Employers screen for it early because it's binary: you have it or you don't.

Rank 2 · In 71% of assessment briefs

Style-guide adherence

AP, Chicago, MLA, APA, AMA, or a house style — employers want evidence you can follow one without drifting. Knowing the rules is one thing; applying them consistently across a 3,000-word piece is another.

⚡ Fastest growing · Rank 3 · In 64% of briefs, up from 31% in 2024

AI-assisted editing fluency

Being able to use tools like Grammarly, LanguageTool, and purpose-built LLMs responsibly — as a first pass that you then override with judgement. Employers test for this by asking how you'd integrate LLM output into a tight deadline workflow without letting it flatten the author's voice.

Rank 4 · In 58% of briefs

Structural / developmental editing judgement

Knowing when a piece needs to be cut in half, reordered, or reframed. Senior editorial hires are often weighted more on this than on mechanics.

Rank 5 · In 53% of briefs

Query-writing

How you push back on the writer. The best editors can challenge an author in a single sentence without triggering a defensive response. It's a skill, and it's testable.

Rank 6 · In 49% of briefs

Fact-checking instinct

Not every claim needs checking — only the checkable ones that would cause real damage if wrong. Strong editors feel the difference. Assessment tasks in this area often ask which claims in a short piece you'd flag for verification and why.

⚡ Fastest growing · Rank 7 · In 44% of briefs, up from 19% in 2024

SEO / structured-metadata editing

Writing meta titles and descriptions that work for both humans and search engines. Editing for structured data (FAQ schema, article schema). Understanding when a headline needs to sacrifice cleverness for clarity — and when it doesn't.

Rank 8 · In 40% of briefs

Industry vocabulary

Legal, medical, scientific, financial, or technical terminology — specialist editors command a clear premium.

Rank 9 · In 37% of briefs

MS Word power-use

Styles, tracked changes, comments, cross-references, find-and-replace with wildcards. It's boring, it's important, and it's surprisingly rare.

Rank 10 · In 29% of briefs

Accessibility editing

Alt-text writing, plain-language rewrites, caption editing, screen-reader-friendly structure. Still niche, but growing quickly as European and US accessibility law tightens.

Know where you stand — free

Take a 10-minute demo test and see your percentile against every other candidate who has taken it.

Try a demo test →

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON