Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Author resubmission protocol

noun

Pronunciation: /ˈɔːθər ˌriːsəbˈmɪʃən ˈprəʊtəˌkɒl/

Standardized procedures governing how authors resubmit revised manuscripts after revisions are requested, including deadlines, version tracking, and resubmission documentation requirements. These protocols ensure consistency and maintain editorial workflow efficiency.

Plain English

Clear rules about how authors should submit revised papers, including deadlines and what information must be included.

Etymology & History

Origin languageOld French, Latin, Italian
Rootautour (author); re- (again); submittere (to submit); protocolum (first sheet)
First recorded use1990s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"The author resubmission protocol required authors to provide a detailed response letter addressing each reviewer comment."

Style guide notes: Always reference the specific journal's resubmission protocol when communicating with authors.

Also known as

revision submission guidelines resubmission procedures revision protocol

Contrasted with

ad hoc resubmission informal revision process

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What must authors include in resubmission?

A detailed response letter explaining how each reviewer comment was addressed and tracked changes showing revisions.

What's the typical resubmission deadline?

Usually 3-6 months depending on journal policy, with extensions available for major revisions.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Essential for understanding author-editor interactions and submission workflow management in journal operations.

Required skill level: Junior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON