Blind Review Assignment
nounPronunciation: /ˈblaɪnd rɪˈvjuː əˈsaɪnmənt/
The editorial practice of removing author and institutional identifying information from manuscripts before distribution to peer reviewers to minimize bias and ensure objective evaluation. This methodology preserves reviewer anonymity while preventing conscious or unconscious bias based on author identity.
Plain English
Sending manuscripts to reviewers without revealing who wrote them, so reviewers judge the work fairly without bias.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal maintains strict blind review assignment protocols to ensure that peer reviewers evaluate manuscripts solely on scientific merit."
Style guide notes: Distinguish between single-blind and double-blind review; capitalize 'Blind Review Assignment' in formal policy documents.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How do editors remove identifying information for blind review?
Author names, institutional affiliations, and identifying citations are redacted from the manuscript document.
Can blind review be completely anonymous?
Often reviewers remain anonymous, but some journals allow authors to know reviewer identities through double-blind review.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Fundamental to understanding fair peer review practices and editorial standards in academic publishing.
Required skill level: Junior