Blind Review Process
nounPronunciation: /blaɪnd rɪˈvjuː ˈprɒsɛs/
A peer review methodology where reviewer identities are concealed from authors while author identities are hidden from reviewers, reducing bias based on reputation, institution, or personal relationships. Single-blind, double-blind, and triple-blind variants exist with varying levels of anonymity.
Plain English
A review system where reviewers and authors don't know each other's identities to reduce bias.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Most journals employ a double-blind review process to minimize author and reviewer bias."
Style guide notes: Specify single-blind, double-blind, or triple-blind when distinguishing review types.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between single and double-blind review?
Single-blind hides reviewer identity; double-blind hides both reviewer and author identities.
Can authors be identified during blind review?
Yes, through self-citations, writing style, or institutional details if authors aren't careful.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Fundamental to understanding peer review mechanisms and editorial quality assurance.
Required skill level: Mid