Double-blind peer review
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˈdʌbəl ˈblaɪnd pɪr rɪˈvjuː/
A review process where both the reviewer and author identities remain concealed from each other throughout evaluation. This mechanism aims to reduce bias and ensure objective assessment of scholarly work based solely on merit.
Plain English
A review method where neither the author nor reviewer knows who the other person is.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal implemented double-blind peer review to minimize reviewer bias in assessing manuscript quality."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used as a compound adjective before a noun.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How does double-blind peer review differ from single-blind review?
Double-blind hides both identities; single-blind hides only the reviewer's identity from the author.
What are the main benefits of double-blind peer review?
It reduces bias, prevents favoritism, and ensures manuscripts are evaluated purely on scientific merit.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding quality control mechanisms in academic publishing and research evaluation.
Required skill level: Junior