Double-Blind Peer Review Implementation
nounPronunciation: /ˌdʌb.əl ˈblaɪnd pɪr rɪˈvjuː ɪm.plɪ.men.ˈteɪ.ʃən/
A peer review process where both reviewer and author identities are concealed from each other to reduce bias and ensure objective evaluation. This methodology is designed to prevent author prestige bias, reviewer conflicts, and promote merit-based assessment.
Plain English
A review system where reviewers and authors don't know each other's identities to make evaluation fairer.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal switched to double-blind peer review implementation to minimize institutional bias in reviewer assessments."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used attributively; specify 'implementation' when discussing adoption.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How do reviewers remain anonymous in double-blind review?
Manuscripts are submitted without author identifying information; reviewer identities are never disclosed to authors.
What are benefits of double-blind peer review?
Reduces author prestige bias, prevents reviewer conflicts, ensures fairer merit-based evaluation of research quality.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Core concept for editorial quality assurance and peer review integrity assessment.
Required skill level: Mid