Editorial Conflict Resolution Protocol
nounPronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl ˈkɑːnflɪkt rɪˈzɑːluːʃən ˈproʊtəˌkɔːl/
A formalized set of procedures for identifying, documenting, and managing conflicts of interest, disputes, or disagreements between authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers during manuscript evaluation. These protocols establish transparency and maintain journal credibility through standardized decision-making pathways.
Plain English
The documented rules journals use to handle disagreements or bias issues that might affect fair publication decisions.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editorial conflict resolution protocol required third-party mediation when the handling editor disclosed a competing financial interest."
Style guide notes: Always capitalize as this is a formal institutional procedure; reference ICMJE or COPE guidelines when applicable.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What conflicts require formal resolution protocols?
Financial interests, institutional relationships, personal disputes, reviewer bias claims, and undisclosed affiliations between involved parties.
How transparent are these conflict resolution processes?
Most protocols require documented disclosure, written records, and often notification to relevant parties while maintaining confidentiality where appropriate.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding journal integrity mechanisms and professional editorial standards.
Required skill level: Senior