Editorial Correspondence Protocol
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˌed.ɪ.ˈtɔːr.i.əl ˌkɒr.ɪ.ˈspɒn.dəns ˈprəʊ.tə.kɔːl/
A standardized system for managing formal communications between editors, authors, reviewers, and other stakeholders throughout the manuscript review and publication process. This protocol establishes response times, communication channels, and documentation procedures.
Plain English
The official rules for how editors communicate with authors and reviewers about manuscript decisions.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal implemented a new editorial correspondence protocol to improve response times."
Style guide notes: Capitalize 'Editorial Correspondence Protocol' when referring to a specific institutional policy.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do journals need correspondence protocols?
They ensure consistent, professional communication and create documented records for accountability and transparency.
What should be included in editorial correspondence?
Decision rationales, reviewer feedback summaries, submission status updates, and action items for all parties.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding professional standards and administrative procedures in academic publishing.
Required skill level: Mid