Editorial Decision Documentation
nounPronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔriəl dɪˈsɪʒən ˌdɑkjəmənˈteɪʃən/
The comprehensive written record maintained by editorial staff detailing the rationale, timeline, and supporting materials for all manuscript decisions from submission through publication. This documentation serves as institutional evidence, audit trail, and reference for consistency reviews.
Plain English
A detailed written record that tracks why editors made each decision about a paper and when they made it.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Editorial decision documentation was critical when the author appealed the rejection and requested a detailed explanation."
Style guide notes: Use 'editorial decision documentation' as standard term; avoid 'editorial file' which is less precise.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How long must editorial decision documentation be retained?
Industry standards recommend 3-7 years minimum; some journals retain indefinitely for institutional archives.
Can authors access editorial decision documentation?
Limited access typically provided; full reviewer comments remain confidential unless journal policy specifies otherwise.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for institutional compliance, audit procedures, and understanding editorial accountability systems.
Required skill level: Mid