editorial prerogative
nounPronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl ˈprɛrəɡətɪv/
The authority and discretionary power granted to editors to make final decisions regarding manuscript acceptance, rejection, or revision requirements independent of reviewer recommendations. This authority ensures editorial responsibility for journal quality and standards.
Plain English
The editor's right to make final decisions about a paper regardless of what reviewers recommend.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editor exercised editorial prerogative to reject the manuscript despite mixed reviewer comments."
Style guide notes: Use when discussing editor's final authority; distinguish from advisory board recommendations.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Can editors override unanimous reviewer recommendations?
Yes, editors retain final authority but should document reasoning when overriding strong consensus.
How should editors justify using editorial prerogative?
Provide clear explanations to authors, particularly when decisions contradict reviewer assessments.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding editorial governance structures and decision-making frameworks.
Required skill level: Senior