Editorial Rejection
nounPronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːrɪəl rɪˈdʒɛkʃən/
A decision by the editor-in-chief or handling editor to decline a manuscript without sending it to peer review, typically based on lack of journal fit, scope misalignment, or insufficient quality. This differs from peer-reviewed rejection as it occurs earlier in the process.
Plain English
When an editor rejects your manuscript without sending it to reviewers because it doesn't fit the journal or meet basic standards.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The manuscript received editorial rejection because its methodology did not align with the journal's established standards."
Style guide notes: Distinguish from 'desk reject' terminology; some journals use terms interchangeably but editorial rejection is more formal.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Can editorially rejected manuscripts be appealed?
Most journals allow formal appeals with substantial new information or evidence of editorial error.
Why submit to another journal after editorial rejection?
Editorial decisions are journal-specific; different journals may have different scope or quality assessments.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding early-stage publication decisions and managing expectations in academic publishing.
Required skill level: Mid