Editorial Retraction Protocol
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl rɪˈtrækʃən ˈproʊtəˌkɑːl/
A standardized procedure established by editors and publishers for identifying, investigating, and formally retracting published articles due to scientific misconduct, data errors, or ethical violations. This protocol ensures transparent communication with readers and maintains journal integrity.
Plain English
The formal process a journal uses to officially remove or correct published papers due to serious errors or misconduct.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal's editorial retraction protocol required investigation and peer consultation before publishing the formal retraction notice."
Style guide notes: Distinguish retraction protocols from correction notices; retractions invalidate entire works while corrections modify specific errors.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers an editorial retraction protocol?
Proven misconduct, plagiarism, fabricated data, major calculation errors, or ethical violations invalidating research conclusions.
Who decides if an article should be retracted?
Editors work with authors, reviewers, and institutions to investigate allegations before making formal retraction decisions.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for editorial staff managing research integrity and understanding journal accountability mechanisms.
Required skill level: Expert