Editorial triage
noun phrasePronunciation: /ɛdɪˈtɔːriəl ˈtraɪɪdʒ/
The systematic assessment and categorization of incoming manuscripts based on scope, quality, and fit with journal standards to determine appropriate handling pathways. This process determines whether submissions proceed to peer review, undergo desk rejection, or require revision before consideration.
Plain English
Sorting submitted manuscripts to decide which ones deserve peer review and which don't.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editor performed editorial triage on 250 submissions, rejecting 60% for scope misalignment."
Style guide notes: Use 'editorial triage' consistently when describing initial manuscript filtering processes.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What criteria are used in editorial triage decisions?
Scope alignment, research quality, originality, methodology soundness, and journal audience relevance are key criteria.
Can authors appeal editorial triage rejections?
Most journals allow appeals with substantial revisions addressing specific feedback from editors.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for evaluating editorial decision-making processes and manuscript flow management.
Required skill level: Senior