in-house editorial review
nounPronunciation: /ɪn ˈhaʊs ˌɛd.ɪˈtɔːr.i.əl rɪˈvjuː/
A preliminary evaluation of submitted manuscripts conducted by journal staff editors before or instead of external peer review. This includes assessment of methodology, clarity, compliance with journal standards, and overall fit without external reviewer involvement.
Plain English
When the journal's own editorial staff examine a paper to evaluate its quality and suitability before sending it to outside reviewers.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal implemented mandatory in-house editorial review to identify critical flaws before peer review assignment."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'in-house' when used as modifier; use without hyphen when predicative.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Who conducts in-house editorial reviews?
Senior editors, associate editors, or editorial coordinators with subject expertise conduct these evaluations.
Does in-house review replace peer review?
No, in-house review typically precedes peer review; it can filter unsuitable submissions to save reviewer time.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding quality control mechanisms and editorial decision-making processes in journal operations.
Required skill level: Mid