Manuscript Languishing Assessment
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˈmænəˌskrɪpt ˈlæŋɡwɪʃɪŋ əˈsɛsmənt/
A periodic evaluation process examining manuscripts stuck in the editorial pipeline to identify bottlenecks, determine publication viability, and decide whether to move forward, request revision, or decline. This assessment helps journals maintain efficient workflow and clear backlogs.
Plain English
Reviewing papers that have been pending for too long to decide whether to publish, revise, or reject them.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our quarterly manuscript languishing assessment identified 47 papers requiring editorial action within six months."
Style guide notes: Use 'languishing' to indicate extended delays; consider context when distinguishing from legitimate review periods.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How long should a manuscript remain in review before languishing assessment?
Typically 12-18 months depending on discipline; assessment triggers decision-making on publication viability.
What happens to manuscripts identified during assessment?
Editors decide to advance publication, request revisions, decline, or contact authors regarding timeline updates.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Valuable for senior editorial staff optimizing journal operations and managing publication timelines effectively.
Required skill level: Senior