Manuscript Status Communication
nounPronunciation: /ˈmænjuskrɪpt ˈsteɪtəs kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃən/
The systematic process of providing regular updates to authors regarding their manuscript's progress through the editorial workflow, including receipt confirmation, peer review stage, revision decisions, and publication status. Transparent communication reduces author anxiety and maintains journal credibility.
Plain English
Keeping authors informed about what stage their manuscript is at and when they can expect decisions or next steps.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Manuscript status communication through automated emails reduced author inquiries by 60% and improved satisfaction ratings."
Style guide notes: Use clear, accessible language in status communications rather than technical jargon to ensure author comprehension.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How frequently should journals communicate manuscript status to authors?
Best practice involves updates at receipt, peer review assignment, decision notification, and before publication, plus proactive communication on delays.
What information should be included in status communications?
Current processing stage, expected timeline to next update, reviewer assignment status (without identifying reviewers), decision rationale, and action required.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for evaluating editorial communication practices and their impact on author experience and publication efficiency metrics.
Required skill level: Junior