Open peer review
nounPronunciation: /ˈoʊpən ˈpɪr rɪˈvjuː/
A transparent review process where reviewer names and identities are disclosed to authors, and often reviewer reports are published alongside articles. This model contrasts with traditional anonymous peer review and aims to increase accountability and reduce reviewer bias.
Plain English
A review system where reviewers' names are known to authors and their comments may be published with the article.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal is transitioning to open peer review to improve transparency and encourage more constructive reviewer feedback."
Style guide notes: Distinguish from 'open access' which refers to article availability, not review process transparency.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do some reviewers refuse open peer review assignments?
Concerns about retaliation, career implications, or discomfort with public attribution of critical feedback may deter participation.
Does open peer review improve review quality?
Research shows mixed results; some studies indicate higher quality feedback while others report minimal differences from anonymous review.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Relevant for understanding modern peer review variations and their implications for editorial management.
Required skill level: Mid