Basic Technical Commonly tested

Peer review anonymity protocol

noun

Pronunciation: /pɪr rɪˈvjuː əˈnɑːnɪməti ˈprɑːtəkɑːl/

The systematic implementation of blind or double-blind review procedures to ensure reviewer and/or author identities remain confidential during manuscript evaluation. This protocol protects against bias and maintains the integrity of the peer review process.

Plain English

A set of rules that keeps reviewers and authors from knowing each other's identities while reviewing scientific papers.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin, Old French, Greek

RootLatin 'par' (equal), Old French 'review' (to look again), Greek 'anonymos' (without name), Latin 'protocollum' (original leaf)

First recorded use1960s

Usage frequencyVery common

Usage

"The journal implemented a strict peer review anonymity protocol to minimize potential conflicts of interest."

Style guide notes: Capitalize 'Peer Review Anonymity Protocol' when referring to specific institutional policies.

Also known as

blind review procedure confidential review system masked peer evaluation

Contrasted with

open peer review signed review system

Related Terms

conflict of interest declaration manuscript evaluation criteria reviewer assignment process

Frequently Asked Questions

What is peer review anonymity protocol?

A process that hides reviewer and author identities to prevent bias during manuscript evaluation.

Why do journals use anonymity protocols?

To ensure fair, unbiased evaluation and maintain the integrity of the peer review process.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Critical for understanding ethical standards and quality control mechanisms in academic publishing.

Required skill level: Mid

peer review ← Back to glossary Peer Review Assignment