Peer Review Cycle
noun phrasePronunciation: /pɪr rɪˈvjuː ˈsaɪkəl/
The complete process from manuscript submission through reviewer evaluation, author revision, and final editorial decision. It encompasses all interactions between reviewers, authors, and editors until a determination is reached.
Plain English
The entire journey a manuscript takes from being sent to reviewers until the editor makes a final accept or reject decision.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The peer review cycle for this manuscript took approximately four months from initial submission to final decision."
Style guide notes: Capitalize when referring to a specific journal's established cycle; lowercase when discussing peer review cycles generally.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a typical peer review cycle last?
Duration varies by field, typically ranging from 2-6 months depending on reviewer availability and revision requests.
What happens during the peer review cycle?
Manuscripts are assigned reviewers who evaluate quality; authors revise based on feedback; editors make final decisions.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential knowledge for understanding manuscript progression and editorial timelines.
Required skill level: Junior