Peer reviewer selection criteria
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˈpɪər rɪˈvjuːər səˈlɛkʃən ˈkraɪtɪəriə/
The established standards and benchmarks used by editors to identify and invite qualified reviewers based on expertise, publication history, institutional affiliation, and absence of conflicts of interest. These criteria ensure review quality and impartiality.
Plain English
The guidelines editors use to choose qualified reviewers with relevant expertise and no conflicts of interest for manuscript evaluation.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal's peer reviewer selection criteria prioritized researchers with recent publications in the specific subfield."
Style guide notes: Use plural 'criteria' consistently; hyphenate when modifying compound nouns.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes a qualified peer reviewer?
Subject matter expertise, publication history, absence of conflicts, and availability for timely review completion.
Can authors suggest reviewers?
Many journals allow author suggestions but editors make final reviewer selection decisions.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Fundamental for understanding peer review integrity and editorial quality control mechanisms.
Required skill level: Mid