rejection without review
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈdʒɛkʃən wɪðˈaʊt rɪˈvju/
An editorial decision to decline a manuscript before it undergoes peer review, typically based on scope misalignment, poor quality, or incomplete submission requirements. This desk-rejection process conserves reviewer resources while maintaining journal standards.
Plain English
When editors reject a manuscript immediately without sending it to peer reviewers, usually because it doesn't fit the journal.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editor issued a rejection without review due to the manuscript's failure to address the journal's publication scope."
Style guide notes: Use 'desk rejection' and 'rejection without review' interchangeably in editorial communications.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do editors reject manuscripts without review?
Scope mismatch, insufficient novelty, poor writing quality, or incomplete requirements prevent time-consuming peer review.
Can authors appeal a rejection without review?
Yes, most journals accept appeals with detailed justification, though reversal rates remain low.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding journal workflow efficiency and early-stage manuscript evaluation criteria.
Required skill level: Mid