Retraction Notice Issuance Protocol
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈnəʊtɪs ˈɪʃuːəns ˈprəʊtəkɔːl/
A formal procedural framework governing the preparation, review, and public distribution of retraction notices when published articles are withdrawn due to errors, misconduct, or other validity concerns. The protocol ensures transparent communication with readers and maintains journal credibility through standardized retraction procedures.
Plain English
A set of formal procedures for officially withdrawing a published article and publicly explaining why it was retracted.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal's retraction notice issuance protocol requires approval from the editor-in-chief and publisher before public distribution."
Style guide notes: Capitalize 'Retraction Notice' when referring to formal published notice; use lowercase 'retraction' for generic references to withdrawn articles.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Who approves retraction notices before publication?
Editor-in-chief, publisher representatives, and sometimes ethics committees review retraction notices for accuracy and appropriate justification language.
How do retraction notices differ from corrections?
Retractions withdraw articles entirely due to fundamental validity concerns; corrections address specific factual errors within retained articles.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for senior editorial staff and tests critical understanding of research integrity, ethical publication obligations, and transparency requirements.
Required skill level: Expert