Reviewer Solicitation Protocol
nounPronunciation: /rɪˈvjuːər səˌlɪsɪˈteɪʃən ˈproʊtəˌkɔl/
The standardized procedural framework governing how editors identify, contact, and negotiate with potential reviewers to secure peer review commitments for manuscripts. It includes reviewer qualification verification, invitation timing optimization, acceptance rate tracking, and follow-up procedures for non-responsive candidates.
Plain English
The systematic procedure for finding, contacting, and securing reviewers to evaluate submitted manuscripts.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal's reviewer solicitation protocol prioritized early-career researchers to diversify the reviewer pool."
Style guide notes: Distinguish 'solicitation protocol' from 'assignment process'; solicitation precedes assignment and includes recruitment elements.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How many reviewers should editors solicit per manuscript?
Most journals invite 4-6 reviewers to ensure at least 2-3 timely acceptances considering typical decline rates.
What documentation does solicitation protocol require?
Invitation records, acceptance/decline logs, reviewer qualifications, and conflict-of-interest confirmations should be documented.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Reviewer solicitation protocol competency reflects knowledge of recruitment efficiency, bias prevention, and reviewer pool management.
Required skill level: Mid