Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Revision Request Categorization

noun

Pronunciation: /rɪˈvɪʒən rɪˈkwɛst ˌkætəɡərɪˈzeɪʃən/

The systematic classification of editorial feedback into distinct levels such as minor revisions, major revisions, or substantial revisions to guide authors on the extent of manuscript changes required. This categorization clarifies expectations and standardizes the revision process across different submissions.

Plain English

Sorting editorial feedback into levels like minor or major changes to show authors what work is needed.

Etymology & History

Origin languageEnglish
Rootrevision (Latin revisere) + request (Latin requaerere) + categorization (Latin categoria)
First recorded use2010s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"The editorial office uses Revision Request Categorization to provide authors with clear guidance on manuscript improvements."

Style guide notes: Use lowercase when referring generally; capitalize when referring to specific journal system.

Also known as

revision tier system feedback classification revision level designation

Contrasted with

unstructured feedback vague revision instructions

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

What distinguishes minor from major revisions?

Minor involves small edits; major requires substantial content, methodology, or interpretation changes.

How should authors respond to Revision Request Categorization?

Authors provide detailed response letter addressing each point within the specified revision category.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Important for evaluating editorial communication clarity and revision management processes.

Required skill level: Mid

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON