Single-Blind Review Process
nounPronunciation: /ˈsɪŋɡəl ˈblaɪnd rɪˈvjuː ˈprɑːses/
A peer review system where reviewers know the author's identity, but authors do not know the reviewers' identities, maintaining reviewer anonymity while allowing reviewers access to author information. This approach balances transparency with reviewer protection and is common in many academic journals.
Plain English
A review process where authors know reviewers aren't hidden, but reviewers stay anonymous to the authors.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal switched to a single-blind review process to increase transparency while protecting reviewer anonymity."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'single-blind' when used as compound adjective; maintain consistency in review type terminology.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Why use single-blind review instead of double-blind?
Single-blind review is easier to implement, faster, and maintains reviewer anonymity while allowing reviewer expertise verification.
Can authors request reviewer anonymity in single-blind review?
No, the single-blind process inherently reveals author identity; authors cannot request additional anonymity protection.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for understanding different peer review methodologies and their implications for author-reviewer relationships.
Required skill level: Mid