Supplementary Material Assessment
nounPronunciation: /ˌsʌpləˈmɛntəri məˈtɪəriəl əˈsɛsmənt/
The editorial evaluation and validation of additional data, figures, tables, videos, or multimedia content submitted alongside the main manuscript to ensure scientific value, clarity, and proper formatting. This assessment determines whether supplementary materials enhance the manuscript or should be removed/relocated to avoid publication delays.
Plain English
The review process for extra files, data, videos, or images that authors include with their paper to check if they're necessary and properly formatted.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Supplementary material assessment determined that the raw dataset was essential for reproducibility but the supporting video could be archived separately."
Style guide notes: Abbreviate as 'supplementary material' (singular) when referring to the collective content category.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What types of content qualify as supplementary material?
Raw datasets, extended methodology, additional figures, videos, code, and materials not essential to main narrative.
Are supplementary materials peer reviewed?
Typically assessed for clarity and completeness by editors; detailed peer review depends on journal policy.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Tests editorial judgment about manuscript structure, content organization, and publication efficiency decisions.
Required skill level: Mid