Supplementary Materials Review
nounPronunciation: /ˌsʌpləˈmɛntəri məˈtɪəriəlz rɪˈvjuː/
The editorial process of evaluating supporting data, appendices, and multimedia files submitted alongside primary manuscript content to ensure relevance and quality. Reviewers assess whether supplementary materials enhance understanding without duplicating primary findings.
Plain English
The evaluation of additional files like datasets, videos, or appendices that authors submit to support their research paper.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The supplementary materials review identified three large datasets requiring validation before editor approval."
Style guide notes: Use 'supplementary materials' as the preferred term; avoid 'supplemental' in formal journal contexts.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What types of files qualify as supplementary materials?
Datasets, extended tables, raw data, videos, code, additional figures, and detailed methodological appendices typically qualify.
Are supplementary materials always peer-reviewed?
Not always; editors assess relevance while peer reviewers may evaluate technical quality based on journal policies.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for evaluating editorial competency in managing complex multi-format research submissions.
Required skill level: Mid