Supplementary Materials Vetting
nounPronunciation: /ˌsʌpləˈmɛntəri məˈtɪəriəlz ˈvɛtɪŋ/
The editorial process of evaluating and approving additional content such as appendices, datasets, videos, and code that authors submit alongside their main manuscript. This procedure ensures supplementary materials meet quality standards, are accessible, and support rather than obscure the primary research findings.
Plain English
Review and approval of extra materials like datasets, code, and appendices that authors include with their paper.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The supplementary materials vetting process identified corrupted data files that required resubmission by the authors."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'supplementary materials' when used as compound modifier before noun.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What types of materials undergo vetting?
Datasets, source code, multimedia files, detailed protocols, and raw data supporting research findings.
Can supplementary materials be rejected?
Yes, materials exceeding size limits, containing proprietary information, or lacking clarity may be rejected.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding quality assurance of research reproducibility and transparency mechanisms.
Required skill level: Mid