Triple-Blind Review Protocol
nounPronunciation: /ˈtrɪpəl blaɪnd rɪˈvjuː ˈproʊtəˌkɑl/
A peer review methodology where authors, reviewers, and handling editors are mutually anonymous throughout the evaluation process. This advanced anonymization method aims to eliminate bias at all evaluation levels, beyond standard double-blind practices.
Plain English
A review process where reviewers don't know who wrote the paper, authors don't know who reviewed it, and editors hide identities too.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Several high-impact journals adopted triple-blind review protocol to reduce reviewer bias and strengthen research credibility."
Style guide notes: Specify the implementation method when referencing triple-blind protocols as practices vary by discipline.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How is triple-blind review different from double-blind review?
Triple-blind adds editor anonymity; double-blind only hides author and reviewer identities.
What are challenges of implementing triple-blind review?
Requires sophisticated systems, may reduce reviewer accountability, and increases administrative complexity.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for advanced understanding of bias mitigation strategies in peer review systems.
Required skill level: Expert