Blind Peer Review Process
nounPronunciation: /blaɪnd pɪr rɪˈvjuː ˈprɑːsɛs/
A manuscript evaluation methodology where reviewer identities remain confidential to authors while author identities may or may not be disclosed to reviewers, designed to minimize bias and ensure objective scientific assessment. Single-blind (reviewers anonymous to authors) and double-blind (mutual anonymity) are common implementations.
Plain English
A review system where peer reviewers' names are hidden from authors to prevent bias.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal employs a blind peer review process to reduce the influence of reviewer identity on editorial decisions."
Style guide notes: Clearly state blind review methodology in journal's author guidelines and masthead information.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between single-blind and double-blind review?
Single-blind hides reviewers from authors; double-blind also hides authors from reviewers for complete anonymity.
Can authors identify reviewers in blind peer review?
No, that is the purpose of blind review—reviewer identities remain confidential unless voluntarily disclosed.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Fundamental for understanding quality assurance mechanisms and fairness principles in academic publishing workflows.
Required skill level: Junior