Decision Communication Framework
nounPronunciation: /dɪˈsɪʒən kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃən ˈfreɪmˌwɜrk/
The structured approach governing how editorial offices communicate manuscript decisions (acceptance, rejection, or revision requests) to authors, including message content standardization, timing protocols, and appeal procedure documentation. This framework ensures consistent, transparent, and constructive feedback delivery across all decision types.
Plain English
The standardized process for communicating editorial decisions and feedback to manuscript authors.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The decision communication framework required detailed explanations of rejection rationales to support author appeals."
Style guide notes: Use 'decision communication' as two separate words; 'framework' emphasizes the systematic structure rather than individual communications.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What should rejection decision communications include?
Clear rejection rationale, summary reviewer feedback, journal scope alignment explanation, and appeal information should be included.
How quickly should decisions be communicated?
Editorial offices typically communicate decisions within 1-2 business days after final decision to minimize author uncertainty.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Decision communication framework understanding demonstrates proficiency in professional communication, transparency, and author relations management.
Required skill level: Mid