Double-Blind Review Coordination
nounPronunciation: /ˈdʌbəl blaɪnd rɪˈvjuː koʊˌɔrdɪˈneɪʃən/
The organizational and technical process of anonymizing both authors and reviewers during manuscript evaluation to reduce bias and ensure objective assessment. This coordination requires careful handling of identifying information and specialized editorial workflow management.
Plain English
Managing the process where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other during the review of a manuscript.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Effective double-blind review coordination requires editorial assistants to remove author identifiers from manuscripts before distribution."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used as an adjective; use consistent terminology across all editorial guidelines.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is double-blind review coordination important?
It reduces bias from both reviewer prejudices and author expectations, improving objectivity and fairness in manuscript evaluation.
What challenges arise in double-blind review coordination?
Identifying information may remain visible in citations, metadata, or writing style; robust protocols minimize but cannot eliminate this risk.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for assessing knowledge of review process implementation and understanding of bias mitigation in academic publishing.
Required skill level: Mid