Double-blind review process
nounPronunciation: /ˈdʌbəl ˈblaɪnd rɪˈvjuː ˈprəʊsɛs/
A peer review methodology where neither the reviewers nor the authors' identities are revealed to each other throughout the evaluation process. This anonymity is intended to reduce bias and ensure merit-based assessment of submitted manuscripts.
Plain English
A review system where authors and reviewers don't know each other's identities to keep evaluations fair.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal maintains a double-blind review process to minimize potential biases related to author reputation or institutional affiliation."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used as a compound adjective before 'review.'
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How do editors maintain anonymity in double-blind review?
Author names are removed from submissions, and reviewer identities are protected throughout the evaluation.
What are advantages of double-blind review over open review?
It reduces personal bias, prevents reviewer retaliation, and ensures evaluation focuses on manuscript quality.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Double-blind review is fundamental to research ethics and appears across editorial policy and quality assurance assessments.
Required skill level: Mid