Double-Blind Reviewer Assignment
nounPronunciation: /ˈdʌbəl ˈblaɪnd rɪˈvjuːər əˈsaɪnmənt/
A review process where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the evaluation period. This mechanism minimizes bias and ensures objective assessment of manuscript merit.
Plain English
A review process where neither the author nor reviewer knows the other's identity to ensure fair evaluation.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Most journals employ double-blind reviewer assignment to prevent author bias and ensure equitable evaluation."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used as a modifier before a noun.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How does double-blind review prevent bias?
Anonymity prevents reviewers from judging based on author identity, institution, or reputation rather than merit.
Can anonymity be compromised during review?
Yes, through self-citations, distinctive methodology descriptions, or institutional identifiers in the manuscript text.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Critical for understanding peer review integrity, editorial policies, and research credibility assurance methods.
Required skill level: Mid