Double-Blind Review Protocol
nounPronunciation: /ˈdʌbəl ˈblaɪnd rɪˈvjuː ˈproʊtəˌkɑːl/
A peer review methodology in which both reviewer and author identities remain concealed from each other throughout the evaluation process to minimize bias. This protocol is designed to ensure evaluation is based on manuscript merit rather than authorship or institutional affiliation.
Plain English
A fair review process where neither the reviewer nor author knows the other's identity to prevent bias.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal employs double-blind review protocol to ensure that reviewer evaluations are based purely on scientific merit."
Style guide notes: Hyphenate 'double-blind' when used as an adjective; capitalize when beginning a sentence.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How do authors maintain anonymity in double-blind review?
Authors remove identifying information, remove self-citations, and don't mention their institution in the manuscript.
Why use double-blind instead of single-blind review?
Double-blind reduces reviewer bias against authors' reputations or institutions, improving fairness of evaluation.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Fundamental concept in understanding peer review methodology and editorial quality standards.
Required skill level: Mid