Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Editorial Correspondence

noun

Pronunciation: /ˌɛd.ɪˈtɔr.i.əl ˌkɔr.ə.ˈspɑn.dəns/

Written communication between editors, authors, and reviewers regarding manuscript status, decision rationale, and revision requests throughout the publication process. This documentation maintains a complete audit trail of editorial decisions and stakeholder interactions.

Plain English

Email and letters exchanged between editors, authors, and reviewers about a manuscript during the publication process.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin and Old French
Rootedere (to publish) + cor (heart) + spondere (to promise)
First recorded use1970s
Usage frequencyVery common

Usage

"Editorial correspondence revealed that the initial rejection was based on a single reviewer's methodological concerns."

Style guide notes: Use as two separate words; maintain formal tone in all editorial correspondence to ensure professionalism and accountability.

Also known as

editor communication manuscript communication editorial exchange

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Who participates in editorial correspondence?

Editors-in-chief, associate editors, authors, and assigned peer reviewers exchange messages throughout the publication timeline.

How long are editorial correspondence records retained?

Most journals retain records for 3-7 years minimum to document decision-making and ensure accountability.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Fundamental to understanding editorial workflows, documentation requirements, and professional communication standards in journal management.

Required skill level: Junior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON