Editorial Decision Communication
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl dɪˈsɪʒən kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃən/
The formal notification process through which editors convey acceptance, rejection, or revision requirements to authors with detailed explanations and reviewer feedback. Clear communication establishes transparency and supports author understanding of decisions.
Plain English
Telling authors whether their manuscript is accepted, rejected, or needs revisions, along with the reasons why.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Timely editorial decision communication improved author satisfaction ratings by providing comprehensive reviewer feedback."
Style guide notes: Use formal register; maintain professional tone throughout all editorial communications.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What should editorial decision communication include?
Decision rationale, anonymized reviewer comments, specific improvement suggestions, and appeal procedures if applicable.
How quickly should editorial decisions be communicated?
Within 2-4 weeks of decision, allowing authors sufficient time to respond or plan next steps.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Key competency for evaluating editorial professionalism, author relations, and institutional communication standards in journal management.
Required skill level: Mid