Skip to main content
Basic Formal IVT Commonly tested

Editorial Decision Communication Protocol

noun phrase

Pronunciation: /ɛˈdɪtɔːrɪəl dɪˈsɪʒən kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃən ˈprəʊtəkɒl/

A standardized procedure for notifying authors of editorial decisions with appropriate detail, rationale, and clarity regarding acceptance, rejection, or requests for revision. Effective communication protocols enhance author satisfaction and provide constructive feedback.

Plain English

The formal process for telling authors whether their paper was accepted, rejected, or needs changes.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin, French
Rooteditorius (editor) + decidere (to decide) + communicare (to share)
First recorded use1990s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"The editorial decision communication protocol ensures authors receive detailed feedback within 48 hours of final decision."

Style guide notes: Use 'protocol' for formal procedures; distinguish from informal decision notifications.

Also known as

author notification procedure decision communication standard

Contrasted with

vague rejection notices

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Should rejection letters include reviewer comments?

Yes, constructive feedback helps authors understand the decision and improve their work.

How detailed should decision communication be?

Provide sufficient detail for authors to understand criteria and next steps, balancing clarity with brevity.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Evaluates understanding of professional communication standards and author relations in journal management.

Required skill level: Mid

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON