Editorial Decision Communication Protocol
noun phrasePronunciation: /ɛˈdɪtɔːrɪəl dɪˈsɪʒən kəˌmjuːnɪˈkeɪʃən ˈprəʊtəkɒl/
A standardized procedure for notifying authors of editorial decisions with appropriate detail, rationale, and clarity regarding acceptance, rejection, or requests for revision. Effective communication protocols enhance author satisfaction and provide constructive feedback.
Plain English
The formal process for telling authors whether their paper was accepted, rejected, or needs changes.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editorial decision communication protocol ensures authors receive detailed feedback within 48 hours of final decision."
Style guide notes: Use 'protocol' for formal procedures; distinguish from informal decision notifications.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
Should rejection letters include reviewer comments?
Yes, constructive feedback helps authors understand the decision and improve their work.
How detailed should decision communication be?
Provide sufficient detail for authors to understand criteria and next steps, balancing clarity with brevity.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Evaluates understanding of professional communication standards and author relations in journal management.
Required skill level: Mid