Skip to main content
Basic Formal IVT Commonly tested

Editorial Decision Letter Composition

noun

Pronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl dɪˈsɪʒən ˈlɛtər kɒmpəˈzɪʃən/

The structured preparation of formal communications from editors to authors regarding manuscript review outcomes, including rationale for decisions and reviewer feedback summaries. This critical document maintains scholarly standards while providing constructive guidance for revision or resubmission.

Plain English

Writing the official email from the editor telling an author whether their paper is accepted, rejected, or needs changes.

Etymology & History

Origin languageEnglish
Rooteditorial (of editors) + decision (choice) + letter (written message) + composition (arrangement)
First recorded use1970s
Usage frequencyVery common

Usage

"Effective editorial decision letter composition requires balancing honesty with encouragement to maintain author relations."

Style guide notes: Use 'decision letter' for brevity; maintain consistent tone and terminology across all editorial communications.

Also known as

editor letter drafting decision communication outcome notification

Contrasted with

peer review feedback anonymous critique

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Should editors disclose all reviewer comments in decision letters?

Most journals summarize feedback without disclosing reviewers' identities; some allow full comment disclosure with approval.

How detailed should rejection rationales be?

Rejection letters should explain decision reasoning and identify specific weaknesses while remaining professional and constructive.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Critical skill for editors and editorial managers responsible for author communications and relationship management.

Required skill level: Senior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON