Skip to main content
Basic Technical IVT Commonly tested

Editorial desk reject

noun

Pronunciation: /ˈɛdɪtɔːrɪəl ˈdɛsk rɪˈdʒɛkt/

A rejection decision made by an editor without sending the manuscript to peer review, typically due to poor fit with journal scope, insufficient quality, or failure to meet submission guidelines. Desk rejects are efficient mechanisms to expedite the review process for unsuitable submissions.

Plain English

When an editor rejects a paper immediately without asking reviewers to evaluate it.

Etymology & History

Origin languageEnglish
Rootdesk (editorial office) and reject (refuse to accept)
First recorded use1980s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"The manuscript received an editorial desk reject because the research design did not align with the journal's publication criteria."

Style guide notes: Use 'desk reject' as standard terminology; distinguish clearly from peer-review rejections in decision communications.

Also known as

desk rejection editor rejection out-of-scope rejection

Contrasted with

acceptance peer review

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do journals use desk rejects?

To reduce reviewer workload by filtering unsuitable submissions and accelerate review timelines for manuscripts with merit.

Can I appeal an editorial desk reject?

Appeal policies vary by journal; some journals allow appeals with substantive new information or clarifications about scope fit.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Essential for understanding editorial workflow efficiency and commonly included in journal management training materials.

Required skill level: Junior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON