Editorial Desk Rejection
nounPronunciation: /ˌɛdɪtɔːriəl ˈdɛsk rɪˈdʒɛkʃən/
An immediate rejection of a manuscript by the journal's editor before it undergoes peer review, typically because it fails to meet the journal's scope, quality standards, or formatting requirements. Desk rejections expedite the process by preventing unsuitable submissions from entering the full review cycle.
Plain English
When an editor quickly rejects a manuscript without sending it to reviewers because it doesn't fit the journal's standards.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The manuscript received an editorial desk rejection due to its focus on clinical practice rather than original research."
Style guide notes: Use 'desk rejection' as shorthand; clearly distinguish from peer review decisions.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What are common reasons for editorial desk rejections?
Out-of-scope topics, poor quality, insufficient novelty, ethical concerns, and formatting violations.
Can authors appeal an editorial desk rejection?
Some journals allow appeals with detailed responses; policies vary by publication.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for authors understanding the initial manuscript evaluation stage and editorial decision criteria.
Required skill level: Junior