Editorial Desk Review
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˌɛdɪˈtɔːriəl dɛsk rɪˈvjuː/
An initial screening process conducted by journal editors to assess manuscript suitability for the journal's scope, quality standards, and technical requirements before formal peer review assignment. This desk-level evaluation determines whether a manuscript advances to peer review or receives a desk rejection.
Plain English
An editor's quick assessment of whether a manuscript fits the journal and meets basic quality standards before sending it for peer review.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The manuscript underwent editorial desk review and was rejected within two days due to poor alignment with the journal's scope."
Style guide notes: Consistently use 'editorial desk review' rather than shortened forms to maintain clarity in formal contexts.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What percentage of manuscripts typically fail desk review?
Rates vary by journal, typically ranging from 20-50% for high-impact publications.
Can desk rejection decisions be appealed?
Most journals allow limited appeals with substantial new information addressing original rejection reasons.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding early-stage editorial decision-making and filtering in journal submission workflows.
Required skill level: Mid