Ethical Review Escalation Procedure
noun phrasePronunciation: /ɛˈθɪkəl rɪˈvjuː ɪˌskæleɪʃən prəˈsɛdʒər/
A structured protocol that editorial teams implement when manuscripts raise concerns about research ethics, animal welfare, human subjects protection, or data integrity that cannot be resolved through standard review channels. This procedure involves consultation with ethics committees or institutional review boards before editorial decisions are finalized.
Plain English
A formal process journals use to get expert advice when a paper has serious ethical concerns that need special review.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The editorial office invoked the ethical review escalation procedure when reviewers flagged undisclosed conflicts of interest and potential data fabrication."
Style guide notes: Use 'ethical review escalation' in lowercase except when naming a specific institutional procedure; capitalize appropriately for proper nouns.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
When is an ethical review escalation used?
When manuscripts raise significant concerns about human subjects, animal welfare, data integrity, or conflicts of interest requiring expert consultation.
Who participates in ethical escalation reviews?
Editorial staff, institutional review boards, ethics committees, and sometimes external ethics consultants evaluate the manuscript's ethical concerns.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding editorial responsibility in protecting research ethics and maintaining publication integrity standards.
Required skill level: Senior