Skip to main content
Basic Technical Commonly tested

Manuscript Desk Decision

noun

Pronunciation: /ˈmænəskrɪpt dɛsk dɪˈsɪʒən/

An editorial judgment made by the journal's editor-in-chief or associate editor without sending the manuscript to external peer review, typically based on scope, quality, or suitability assessment. This rapid screening process expedites rejection of unsuitable submissions.

Plain English

When journal editors reject or accept a paper themselves without sending it to outside reviewers.

Etymology & History

Origin languageEnglish
Rootmanuscript (from Latin manu scriptus) + desk (from Germanic) + decision (from Latin decidere)
First recorded use1990s
Usage frequencyCommon

Usage

"The editor made a desk decision to reject the manuscript as it fell outside the journal's scope."

Style guide notes: Distinguish between desk decisions and peer review decisions when discussing journal outcomes.

Also known as

desk rejection editorial decision in-house decision

Contrasted with

peer review external evaluation

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you appeal a desk decision rejection?

Some journals allow authors to submit a letter explaining why they believe the decision should be reconsidered.

Why do editors make desk decisions instead of using peer review?

Desk decisions save time and resources by filtering out submissions that don't fit the journal's scope or quality standards.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Important for understanding manuscript handling procedures and editorial efficiency in journal operations.

Required skill level: Mid

Editors from these organizations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON