Manuscript Desk Rejection Criteria
noun phrasePronunciation: /ˈmænjuskrɪpt dɛsk rɪˈdʒɛkʃən kraɪˈtɪəriə/
A set of predetermined objective standards applied during initial editorial screening to quickly identify and reject manuscripts that do not meet the journal's scope, quality thresholds, or technical requirements without sending them to peer review. These criteria streamline the editorial process and reduce reviewer burden.
Plain English
Specific rules editors use to quickly reject papers that don't fit the journal's standards before peer review.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal updated its manuscript desk rejection criteria to exclude studies lacking statistical power analysis."
Style guide notes: Capitalize as formal journal policy term; specify whether criteria are scope-based, quality-based, or format-based in detailed discussions.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What types of manuscripts meet desk rejection criteria?
Papers outside journal scope, with fundamental methodological flaws, lacking originality, or not meeting formatting requirements.
How do desk rejection criteria benefit the editorial process?
They reduce peer review burden, accelerate decisions for unsuitable manuscripts, and ensure reviewers focus on viable submissions.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for testing editorial decision-making processes and understanding efficiency mechanisms in journal management.
Required skill level: Mid