Manuscript Desk Review Assessment
nounPronunciation: /ˈmænjuskrɪpt dɛsk rɪˈvjuː əˈsɛsmənt/
An initial editorial evaluation conducted before external peer review to determine if a manuscript meets basic journal standards for scope, quality, and formatting. This rapid assessment filters unsuitable submissions and prevents unnecessary reviewer burden.
Plain English
An editor's quick initial check to decide if a manuscript is suitable before sending it to peer reviewers.
Etymology & History
Usage
"After manuscript desk review assessment, the editor desk-rejected 40% of submissions for being outside the journal's scope."
Style guide notes: Distinguish 'desk review' from 'peer review' in all documentation and communications.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What criteria guide manuscript desk review assessment?
Journal scope alignment, methodological rigor, writing quality, formatting compliance, and originality requirements.
Can manuscripts appeal desk review rejections?
Policies vary; some journals allow detailed appeals if authors identify assessment errors or provide new information.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Important for understanding how editorial efficiency is maintained through multi-stage evaluation processes.
Required skill level: Mid