Peer Review Cascade
nounPronunciation: /pɪr rɪˈvjuː ˈkæskeɪd/
A sequential process where a manuscript is progressively offered to multiple reviewers in ranked tiers until acceptance commitments are secured. This method optimizes reviewer engagement and reduces delays in obtaining timely feedback.
Plain English
A process of offering a manuscript to reviewers in stages until you find enough who agree to review it.
Etymology & History
Usage
"The journal implemented a peer review cascade to accelerate the selection process during high submission volumes."
Style guide notes: Use 'peer review cascade' as a formal term when describing structured reviewer recruitment processes.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
How does peer review cascade differ from standard review assignment?
Cascade uses sequential tiers of reviewer offers; standard assignment invites reviewers simultaneously across similar expertise levels.
Why would a journal choose a cascade approach?
It reduces review timeline delays by having backup reviewers ready if primary choices decline the invitation.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Essential for understanding modern editorial efficiency strategies and reviewer management systems.
Required skill level: Mid