Peer Review Blinding Protocol
nounPronunciation: /pɪr rɪˈvjuː ˈblaɪndɪŋ ˈproʊtəkɔl/
A systematic procedure that controls the visibility of author and reviewer identities during the evaluation process to minimize bias. This protocol may be single-blind, double-blind, or open review depending on journal policy.
Plain English
The method used to hide or reveal identities of authors and reviewers when evaluating research papers.
Etymology & History
Usage
"Our journal implements a double-blind peer review blinding protocol to ensure impartial evaluation of all submissions."
Style guide notes: Always capitalize 'Peer Review Blinding Protocol' when referring to the specific journal methodology.
Also known as
Contrasted with
Related Terms
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between single-blind and double-blind peer review?
Single-blind hides reviewer identities from authors; double-blind hides both author and reviewer identities from each other.
Why do journals use peer review blinding protocols?
To reduce reviewer bias based on author reputation or affiliation and improve objective evaluation of manuscript quality.
Why Test Candidates on This?
Understanding blinding protocols is essential for editorial staff managing reviewer assignments and maintaining publication integrity.
Required skill level: Mid