Skip to main content
Basic Technical

Retraction Management Protocol

noun phrase

Pronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈmænɪdʒmənt ˈproʊtəkɔːl/

The systematic procedures governing the identification, investigation, and documentation of published articles requiring removal or significant correction due to scientific misconduct, major errors, or ethical violations. This protocol ensures transparency and maintains journal integrity through formal retraction notices and related communications.

Plain English

The formal process a journal follows when removing or significantly correcting a previously published article.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin + Old English + Latin
Rootretractio (drawing back) + managium (handling) + protocollum (first sheet)
First recorded use2000s
Usage frequencyUncommon

Usage

"The publisher invoked its Retraction Management Protocol after discovering fabricated data in the peer-reviewed article."

Style guide notes: Follow ICMJE and COPE guidelines when documenting retraction decisions and announcements.

Also known as

correction procedure withdrawal protocol article removal process

Contrasted with

publication process acceptance procedure

Related Terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Who initiates a retraction in Retraction Management Protocol?

Authors, institutions, funders, or journal editors can initiate based on identified errors or misconduct evidence.

What documentation accompanies a retraction?

A formal retraction notice stating reasons, responsible parties, and links to original article maintains transparency.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Essential for senior editorial staff managing ethical and integrity issues in scientific publishing.

Required skill level: Senior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON