Skip to main content
Basic Formal IVT Commonly tested

retraction notice

noun

Pronunciation: /rɪˈtrækʃən ˈnoʊtɪs/

A formal published statement that withdraws a previously published article due to errors, misconduct, or other serious issues. It alerts readers that the article should not be cited or relied upon.

Full Definition

A retraction notice is an official editorial statement published by a journal to formally withdraw a previously published article from the scholarly record. Retractions occur when significant errors, research misconduct, plagiarism, or other serious issues are discovered that compromise the validity or integrity of the published work. The retraction notice explains the reasons for withdrawal and typically remains linked to the original article. The retracted article usually remains accessible but is clearly marked as retracted.

Plain English

An official announcement that a published research article is being withdrawn because it contains serious errors or problems that make it unreliable.

In Editorial Context

A corrective editorial action that formally withdraws an article while documenting the reasons for retraction and maintaining transparency in the scholarly publishing process.

Etymology & History

Origin languageLatin
Rootretrahere (to draw back) + notitia (knowledge)
Original meaningTo draw back knowledge or information
First recorded use1960s
Usage frequencyUncommon

Emerged as academic publishing developed formal mechanisms for addressing research misconduct and errors

Became more standardized and visible with digital publishing and database indexing

Usage

"The editor-in-chief published a retraction notice after discovering that the study's data had been fabricated."

Usage note: Should clearly state reasons for retraction and be easily discoverable alongside the original article

Context: research integrity, editorial decisions, academic misconduct cases

Region: international

Style guide notes: Chicago Manual recommends formal notice format with clear identification and reasoning; AP suggests prominent placement

In Context

  • "The retraction notice must clearly state the reasons for withdrawal and identify all affected co-authors."
  • "Editorial policy requires retraction notices to remain permanently accessible alongside original article metadata."
  • "We received the retraction notice request from the corresponding author citing significant methodological errors."

Also known as

withdrawal notice retraction statement

Contrasted with

publication endorsement

Don't confuse with

Unlike errata which correct minor errors, retractions completely withdraw articles from the reliable scholarly record

Common mistake: Publishing retractions without proper editorial board approval or failing to provide sufficient detail about retraction reasons

Related Terms

Broader term: publication correction

Frequently Asked Questions

What circumstances require a retraction notice?

Research misconduct, major errors affecting conclusions, duplicate publication, or ethical violations require formal retraction.

Who has authority to initiate article retraction?

Authors, editors, institutions, or publishers can initiate retractions, though editorial board typically makes final decisions.

Should retracted articles be removed from journal websites?

No, retracted articles should remain accessible with clear retraction notices to maintain scholarly record transparency.

Why Test Candidates on This?

Essential for maintaining journal integrity and understanding legal/ethical responsibilities in academic publishing

Required skill level: Senior

Editors from these organisations have used our services since 1998

Reuters BBC Oxford University Press Penguin Random House Springer Microsoft Suncor Energy United Nations Fisher Investments IBM The Home Depot KODAK CHEVRON